| Employee Downsizing |  | 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
 Case Details:
 
 Case Code : HROB016
 Case Length : 09 Pages
 Period : 1990 - 2001
 Pub Date : 2001
 Teaching Note : Available
 Organization : Varied
 Industry : Varied
 Countries : USA, India, etc...
 
 To download Employee Downsizing case study 
(Case Code: HROB016) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
 
 
  
 Price:
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
 For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
 
 
 
 » Human Resource and Organization Behavior Case Studies» HRM Short Case Studies
 » View Detailed Pricing Info
 » How To Order This Case
 » Business Case Studies
 » Area Specific Case Studies
 » Industry Wise Case Studies
 » Company Wise Case Studies
 
 
   
 
 
Please note:
 This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 
 
 
 Chat with us
 
 
  
 Please leave your feedback
 
 
   | 
		
| 
	       
 << Previous ExcerptsThe First Phase
	
		| 
Till the late-1980s, the number of firms that adopted downsizing was rather 
limited, but the situation changed in the early-1990s. Companies such as General 
Electric (GE) and General Motors (GM) downsized to increase productivity and 
efficiency, optimize resources and survive competition and eliminate duplication 
of work after M&As. 
 Some other organizations that made major job cuts during this period were Boeing 
(due to its merger with McDonnell Douglas), Mobil (due to the acquisition of 
Exxon), Deutsche Bank (due to its merger with Bankers Trust) and Hoechst AG (due 
to its merger with Rhone-Poulenc SA)...
 |   
 |  The Second Phase
	By the mid-1990s, factors such as increased investor awareness, stronger 
	economies, fall in inflation, increasing national incomes, decrease in level 
	of unemployment, and high profits, reduced the need for downsizing across 
	the globe. However, just as the downsizing trend seemed to be on a decline, 
	it picked up momentum again in the late-1990s, this time spreading to 
	developing countries as well...  
	
		|  | Tackling the Evils of Downsizing
			During the early 21st century, many companies began offering 
			flexible work arrangements to their employees in an attempt to avoid 
			the negative impact of downsizing. Such an arrangement was reported 
			to be beneficial for both employees as well as the organization. A 
			flexible working arrangement resulted in increased morale and 
			productivity; decreased absenteeism and employee turnover, reduced 
			stress on employees; increased ability to recruit and retain 
			superior quality employees improved service to clients in various 
			time zones; and better use of office equipment and space... |  Lessons from the 'Downsizing Best Practices CompaniesIn the late 1990s, the US government conducted a study on the downsizing 
practices of firms (including major companies in the country). The study 
provided many interesting insights into the practice and the associated 
problems. It was found that the formulation and communication of a proper 
planning and downsizing strategy, the support of senior leaders, incentive and 
compensation planning and effective monitoring systems were the key factors for 
successful downsizing (Refer Exhibit II for highlights of this study)... 
 ExhibitsExhibit I: Guidelines to Tide Over the Downsizing PhaseExhibit II: Highlights of the Downsizing Study
 Exhibit III: Assistance Offered to Downsized Employees & Survivors
 
 |  |